Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Hi Vidhyadhar,
Yes, you are absolutely right and your understanding about the SAP is also
Perfect. I got the thread when it was in its initial stage and I replied in
that regard. I had answered the question "If there is any problem If the
number range the system is picking may create some glitch if
not contiguous". So my answer was "no". Sometimes it happens if
the document is being parked and edited or reversed even. So the number range series
might not be in the way end user is looking after. So in that way my
answer was no, it won't.
I was not supposed to challenge your understanding about SAP system.
Thanks for your quick reply and always helping attitude.
Regards.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Vidhya Dhar
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:34 AM
Subject: FI Document Numbering for New Company Code
Hi Akilesh,
Am not clear about your point of view. Maybe I am not understanding it
alright.
Probably the query to which you gave an answer was different from the one
required by karkkonstant. The initial thread was relating to missing /
skipping document numbers arising during document posting. Am not sure if it
pertained to a G L posting through F-02. Did I miss / fail to see part
of the thread? I wonder!
However, even with regard to a G L posting (be it using FB50 or F-02),
I was under the impression that the document numbering is dependent on
the number range assigned to the document type used during document posting
(while the default document type is SA, you could as well tweak the editing
option to make use of a different document type). I suppose you have the
option of assigning an internal or external number range to such document
type so that either the system or the user may assign document numbers to GL
Transaction postings. Maybe you could try this out and please do let me
know.
OR
Were you referring to creation of General Ledger Master Records and
assigning numbers to such master records? If so, then you are absolutely
right and the assignment of General Ledger Master Records is always, as you
might have meant, external and assigned by the user.
Please feel free to correct me in case I have either understood your point
incorrectly or my understanding of the SAP concept is incorrect. I am
willing to unlearn my misconception and learn the right thing anew.
Regards,
VidhyaDhar |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight   _.____.__ |
