Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from JG-SAPHR on May 8 at 6:41 PM What Paul said is right, I believe. SAP is well integrated with different areas (HR, FI, CO, etc) of a company. The modules can communicate on-line with one another. This can not be achieved with tools like Access database. If SAP can provide a solution that mostly fits with the requirements, then it should be used. If necessary it can be enhance to fill the gaps, with enhancements using bAPI, bADI, etc.
The implementation needs to be well thought out and if necessary to be broken into stages. This may take some time and effort depending on how complex the requirements are. This would definitely bear fruit to satisfy the needs of a company.
Building systems not integrated (or too many systems for one business function) would not be the way to go.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Alexis Martin
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 5:21 PM
Subject: Microsoft Access vs. SAP for Budgeting Purposes
Hi experts,
The company I work for has experienced and is currently working with a really faulty implementation of SAP. (Going on for about 6 years!)
That being said they do not do their budgeting in SAP. A manager has come on board and has literally created this huge access file that basically is an ERP system. I am trying to build a case to go against using Access. I would like to encourage investing the resources to use SAP, the way it should be used. Can anyone please provide some points arguing this point? What are the disadvantages of using Access given that there is no SQL server either?
Please let me know if my question is clear enough.
Thanks,
Alexis |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
