Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
In the company that i am working (a revenue authority) SQVI is there in
Production but only limited to very few individuals. There was a time when
some customized reports could not run even in background owing to large
volumes of data. We had to rely on SQVI to extract critical data.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, rpinto779 via sap-dev <
sap-dev@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
> Posted by rpinto779
> on Jul 28 at 5:14 PM I
> actually do not want to release it in production but our users are asking
> for this. I was wondering what would be the best alternative ... maybe use
> sqvi in qa , translate to a tcode and then transport the tcode into
> production. Was wondering what is the best practice around this
>
> ---------------Original Message---------------
> From: R. Neal Wilhite
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:14 PM
> Subject: Sqvi performance impact
>
> > SQVI - YES, Maybe, Not sure. In that order.
> >
> > SQ01 / SQ02 - In expectation of your asking the same questions about it -
> YES, Maybe, Not Sure.
> >
> > The "maybe's" mean that it depends on your definition of safe. By mine,
> it would be NO.
> >
> > The "not sure's" imply that I can't know how extensively you want to
> implement it. Certain levels of implementation allow you some control
> through authorizations. Other levels of implementation allow the user to
> bypass those authorizations. Also, this is not my strongest area, so there
> may be some tricks that i don't know.
> >
> > Neal
| __.____._ Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| |  _.____.__ |
Mark as helpful
