RE: [sap-log-mm] Moving Average Price Incorrect
Posted by
Admin at
|
Share this post:
|
|
0 Comments
 | Posted by Dave Thornburgh on Mar 16 at 3:20 PM |  Mark as helpful |
Stock counts _should_ never affect the MAP of items valued at MAP, if you
want to please the auditors. Valued at Standard could be different, I don't
know.
Dave
From: mack007 via sap-log-mm [mailto:sap-log-mm@Groups.ITtoolbox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:55 AM
To: Dave Thornburgh
Subject: Re: [sap-log-mm] Moving Average Price Incorrect
Posted by mack007 (consultant )
on Mar 16 at 3:56 AM
<http://it.toolbox.com/api/ContentVote/3374658/1/1 /> Mark this reply as
helpfulMark as helpful
Stock counts can impact the MAP aswell. Have you checked for this.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Dave Thornburgh via sap-log-mm <
sap-log-mm@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
> Posted by Dave Thornburgh
> on Mar 16 at 12:36 AM
> HT -
>
>
>
> It's very simple. If the value of a goods issue is not the same as the
> then-current moving average value, it will cause the moving average to
> change. It's very simple math, really. Of course, it's much more apparent
> when your material is valuated at MAP instead of Standard, but it very
> definitely works that way.
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> From: ha_tran via sap-log-mm [mailto:sap-log-mm@Groups.ITtoolbox.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:34 PM
> To: Dave Thornburgh
> Subject: RE:[sap-log-mm] Moving Average Price Incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP
> Supply Chain Business Analyst)
> on Mar 15 at 11:38 PM
>
> <http://it.toolbox.com/api/ContentVote/3374375/1/1 /> Mark this reply as
> helpfulMark as helpful
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I am quite doubtful that goods issue will have any impact onto MAP except
> for the total stock value. Can you please clarify a particular scenario
> where the MAP is changed due to goods issue transaction?
>
> Cheers,
> HT
>
> ---------------Original Message---------------
> From: Azz Kikr
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:04 PM
> Subject: Moving Average Price Incorrect
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have standard pricing in SAP for a particular material. However, the
> Moving average price which is being calculated by the system as a default
> for statistical purposes only, in Material master record, shows a value
> exponentially higher than the standard price, even though we do not have
> enough inventory into the system to make the moving average price shoot up
> to an order of several $mns. The standard price is significantly lower
than
>
> the Moving average price. In addition to that, there are no transactions
in
>
> the system which will deviate the moving average price from the standard
> price by this big amount. The MAP should be within a couple of dollars
from
>
> standard price, which is not the case here.
> >
> > I have checked the MBEWH table and the price started shooting up
> significantly from the standard price a few months ago. I have checked
MB5B
>
> to see what transactions might have affected the price, but none of the
> transactions listed there have affected the price to make it shoot up.
> >
> > What I am speculating is that another program may be errorneously
> updating
> the MBEW-VERPR field in MatMas. Any suggestions?
__.____._ want to please the auditors. Valued at Standard could be different, I don't
know.
Dave
From: mack007 via sap-log-mm [mailto:sap-log-mm@Groups.ITtoolbox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:55 AM
To: Dave Thornburgh
Subject: Re: [sap-log-mm] Moving Average Price Incorrect
Posted by mack007 (consultant )
on Mar 16 at 3:56 AM
<http://it.toolbox.com/api/ContentVote/3374658/1/1 /> Mark this reply as
helpfulMark as helpful
Stock counts can impact the MAP aswell. Have you checked for this.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Dave Thornburgh via sap-log-mm <
sap-log-mm@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
> Posted by Dave Thornburgh
> on Mar 16 at 12:36 AM
> HT -
>
>
>
> It's very simple. If the value of a goods issue is not the same as the
> then-current moving average value, it will cause the moving average to
> change. It's very simple math, really. Of course, it's much more apparent
> when your material is valuated at MAP instead of Standard, but it very
> definitely works that way.
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> From: ha_tran via sap-log-mm [mailto:sap-log-mm@Groups.ITtoolbox.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:34 PM
> To: Dave Thornburgh
> Subject: RE:[sap-log-mm] Moving Average Price Incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP
> Supply Chain Business Analyst)
> on Mar 15 at 11:38 PM
>
> <http://it.toolbox.com/api/ContentVote/3374375/1/1 /> Mark this reply as
> helpfulMark as helpful
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I am quite doubtful that goods issue will have any impact onto MAP except
> for the total stock value. Can you please clarify a particular scenario
> where the MAP is changed due to goods issue transaction?
>
> Cheers,
> HT
>
> ---------------Original Message---------------
> From: Azz Kikr
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:04 PM
> Subject: Moving Average Price Incorrect
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have standard pricing in SAP for a particular material. However, the
> Moving average price which is being calculated by the system as a default
> for statistical purposes only, in Material master record, shows a value
> exponentially higher than the standard price, even though we do not have
> enough inventory into the system to make the moving average price shoot up
> to an order of several $mns. The standard price is significantly lower
than
>
> the Moving average price. In addition to that, there are no transactions
in
>
> the system which will deviate the moving average price from the standard
> price by this big amount. The MAP should be within a couple of dollars
from
>
> standard price, which is not the case here.
> >
> > I have checked the MBEWH table and the price started shooting up
> significantly from the standard price a few months ago. I have checked
MB5B
>
> to see what transactions might have affected the price, but none of the
> transactions listed there have affected the price to make it shoot up.
> >
> > What I am speculating is that another program may be errorneously
> updating
> the MBEW-VERPR field in MatMas. Any suggestions?
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Dave ThornburghSAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast
Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
Related Content
In the Spotlight
White Papers
In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements
View this thread online
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
