RE:[sap-log-mm] Service Entry - Unplanned vs Planned
Posted by
Admin at
|
Share this post:
|
|
0 Comments
 | Posted by debc66 (MM System Analyst) on Feb 15 at 12:20 AM |  Mark as helpful |
Hi,
If you empty the default G/L account for material group in IMG OMQW, system will ask user to enter G/L for unplanned services manually. Then system will derive the G/L account from PO line item instead of default value for material group.
The impact is the setting would apply for all users. Whenever users would like to include the unplanned services in PO line item, they have to know which G/L account and manually enter it.
---------------Original Message---------------
From: J L
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:35 AM
Subject: Service Entry - Unplanned vs Planned
> Hello.....question regarding the functionality of unplanned service entries vs. planned service entries:<br/>Purchase Order is entered for UNPLANNED SERVICES: Line description is 1 AU for "Test for Services - UNPLANNED". On the Limits Tab, user entered in the overall value and expected value (nothing entered on Services Tab) . User overrides/changes the default GL account which comes from the Material Group on the PO line. Saves the PO.<br/>When it comes time to enter the Service Entry (SE), the GL account which populates (and is greyed out for no change) is the default GL from the Material Group NOT the GL account entered on the Purchase Order. <br/>Conversely, If a PO is created for PLANNED SERVICES, and the GL is overridden on the PO line, as described above, the SE created brings forward the GL that was entered on the PO, not the default from the Material Group. <br/>We would like SAP to bring forward the account information from the PO, whether or not it's overridden and whether or not it's for Planned or Unplanned Svcs. Any ideas?
__.____._ If you empty the default G/L account for material group in IMG OMQW, system will ask user to enter G/L for unplanned services manually. Then system will derive the G/L account from PO line item instead of default value for material group.
The impact is the setting would apply for all users. Whenever users would like to include the unplanned services in PO line item, they have to know which G/L account and manually enter it.
---------------Original Message---------------
From: J L
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:35 AM
Subject: Service Entry - Unplanned vs Planned
> Hello.....question regarding the functionality of unplanned service entries vs. planned service entries:<br/>Purchase Order is entered for UNPLANNED SERVICES: Line description is 1 AU for "Test for Services - UNPLANNED". On the Limits Tab, user entered in the overall value and expected value (nothing entered on Services Tab) . User overrides/changes the default GL account which comes from the Material Group on the PO line. Saves the PO.<br/>When it comes time to enter the Service Entry (SE), the GL account which populates (and is greyed out for no change) is the default GL from the Material Group NOT the GL account entered on the Purchase Order. <br/>Conversely, If a PO is created for PLANNED SERVICES, and the GL is overridden on the PO line, as described above, the SE created brings forward the GL that was entered on the PO, not the default from the Material Group. <br/>We would like SAP to bring forward the account information from the PO, whether or not it's overridden and whether or not it's for Planned or Unplanned Svcs. Any ideas?
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements
View this thread online
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
