RE:[sap-hr] Payroll rule question
Posted by
Admin at
|
Share this post:
|
|
0 Comments
 | Posted by JG-SAPHR (Senior SAP HR Consultant) on Aug 20 at 9:58 PM |  Mark as helpful |
Hi Ruza
As you said it is due to the splits being different, not only for WPBP.
Before this rule, you need another rule to remove the WPBP split in w/t 9000 if the w/t does not need this split.
Or in w/t 9B30 the WPBP split should remain as is; in this case check where it is created and ensure it has the same split as 9000. In pay sim log check the instances of 9B30 and see where the split is removed. See if you can avoid it. The removing of splits cold be due to a proc cl value.
Regards, JG
__.____._ As you said it is due to the splits being different, not only for WPBP.
Before this rule, you need another rule to remove the WPBP split in w/t 9000 if the w/t does not need this split.
Or in w/t 9B30 the WPBP split should remain as is; in this case check where it is created and ensure it has the same split as 9000. In pay sim log check the instances of 9B30 and see where the split is removed. See if you can avoid it. The removing of splits cold be due to a proc cl value.
Regards, JG
Copyright © 2009 CEB Toolbox, Inc. and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
JG-SAPHRsap-hr Enthusiast
Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
View this thread online
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
