Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Hi
If the vac adv amt exists, do not process garnishment.
Include PCRs (call using PIT, par 2 = blank and par 3 = NOAB) in sub schema XAL0, after the garnishment w/t is brought into IT.
Assuming xxxx = w/t for vac adv and yyyy = w/t for garnishment.
In rule ZXXX grpg */xxxx do as below:
ADDWT *
ELIMI *
ZERO=&XXXX
ADDWT&XXXX
In rule ZYYY grpg */yyyy do as below:
ELIMI * Garnishment w/t
AMT=& XXXX Get amt for vac adv
D AMT?0 Vac adv amt not 0?
* -no;do not process garnishment
= RESET * -yes;process garnishment
= 1 ADDWT * - -add to output
Hope this helps
Regards, JG
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Sunil Joshi
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 4:44 PM
Subject: Garnishments SAP Rule UGGR
Hello all,
Our client has a requirement for garnishments which are set up as percentage of gross in infotype 194 and if employee has a vacation advance wagetype on 15. It should not be part of Garnishments Gross wagetype /G01. Has anyone come across this requirement? Would appreciate a few suggestions.
Thanks. |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| |  JG-SAPHR
SAP HR Top Contributor
Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight View the "Managing the Application Life Cycle" webinar and learn how organizations optimize their SAP applications.   _.____.__ |
