Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from rtuccell on Nov 4 at 8:09 AM Hello
your question is not so clear for me...
If I well understood, I assume you made a migration from legacy system, if not please clarify.
The migration should consists more or less in these steps:
1) asset master data + assets values for all areas (transactions AS91/AS92)
2) GL balance initialization
3) verification that FIAA and FIGL systems are consistent from asset point of view (AIBST2)
4) Set reconciliation flag in GL accounts
Do you or your consultants followed these steps ?
If you don't make initial reconciliation before to start working with FIAA module, you'll risk to have differences in your future life.
Hoping these information will help you but, if you need more precise answers you should add more information.
Regards
Rocco
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Nick Dobson
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 12:59 PM
Subject: Use of the Abst2 Report in Fixed Assets
Mind you - I certainly don't consider myself an expert in FI_AA!!
I hoped I could use it to agree an asset take-on dataload with the equivalent GL account postings.
But some GL values are correct, but some are not. Mostly these appear to be additions in the current year...some additions are there, others are not.
The Depreciation values shown are not those actually posted for the current year, but what SAP expects it to be. I am aware that some of the legacy depreciation calculations are a bit incorrect.
I have now agreed all I need to with various reports...but why are some GL account values just not there - even though the actual GL balance is correct.....and why does it not show the actual Depreciation posted in the dataload - but the figure that SAP calculates?
Nick |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
