Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from deddy wijaya on Jun 22 at 5:37 PM Hi Roy,
Thank you so much for your reply despite in your busy time. I really appreciate it and hopefully you had successful meeting.
Basically what I am trying to figure-out is the CO-PA functionality within manufacturing company and in conjunction to PS Module.
If a manufacturing company wanted to track their product costing including the overhead cost, do they have to activate CO-PA?
Further, I am also trying to figure- out what the consequences using CO-PA and without using CO-PA in relation to SD-PS project scenario and what is the best practice?
Once again many thanks for your help.
Hopefully anyone else can also throw some more light.
Thank you and regards,
Deddy
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: gulsahgul87
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:39 AM
Subject: What is the Difference Using CO-PA Vs Not Using CO-PA
hi,
this error with the idea Check mod?ls.
So FI mod?l has sap error icc_tr154
2012/6/22 Roy B email@removed
> **
> Reply from Roy B on Jun 22 at 3:27 AM Sorry but your question is just
> too vague. WE need to know a lot more about what sort of a system you have,
> what other CO sub-modules are active or available to be activated, why you
> have to make this choice and what you want to achieve. For example, do you
> have CO-CCA or CO-PC? CO-PC (Product Costing) would be the logical place to
> track these costs, but you could also use Actual Costing with Material
> Ledger. I have seen people using the GL to analyse costs but this is
> cumbersome and clunky and not to be recommended. So you can see, there are
> many possibilities and we have to zero in on what precisely you need.
>
> Someone else will probably give you the answers because I have to go out
> shortly to the most important meeting of my life.
>
> Rgds, Roy
> |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
