We have added search box. Key in SAP issue keyword to search
TopBottom

Announcement: wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.

RE:[sap-hr] Report RPTBPC10 , Table PTQUODED

Posted by Admin at
Share this post:
Ma.gnolia DiggIt! Del.icio.us Yahoo Furl Technorati Reddit

Posted by HRPY_FLF (HRPY)
on Apr 11 at 11:46 AM
Mark this reply as helpfulMark as helpful
Hi, we have similar case where the PTQUODED got broken between himself and in attendance quota infotype 2007, what I mean in IT2007 has overtime quota with OT hours = 5h hours as example, but when you want to see the screen records( the time deduction) you found its empty, so you have to run RPTBPC10 to rebuild the connection between IT2007 & PTQUODED.
In our environment we are using portal based to record timesheet and leave application to access CATS.
Lately I found out this issue occurred for any employee who has been adjust his time sheet(OT) in the past and change the time records(A & OT) in CATS from 30 to 10( saving) and in same time employee transfer leave request(L) in future date, so what I believe that in transfer CATS tried to get unapproved overtime time data ( in past) with future L time data, system used standard FM CATSTIMESHEET_INSERT. I have sent OSS to SAP and no news so far??
Thanks, Falah

---------------Original Message---------------
From: pejoh
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:15 PM
Subject: Report RPTBPC10 , Table PTQUODED

> Hello all,
> Just to join the chorus, we're also experiencing inconsistencies between PTQUODED and PA2006, and SAP's maintain that we must be able to reproduce the problem before they'll act. We're on version 4.7. So far the only solution I've found is running RPTBPC10 on a regular basis for the affected employees. It's a major problem though, as also RPTIME00 (via operation HRS=F) and RPCALC read data from table PTQUODED.
> I find certain patterns interesting, namely that affected employees often include all employees in a certain cost center/org. unit (we have a 1:1 in our setup). Often inconsistencies appear on the same employees repeatedly.
> Does anyone have a clue to the cause?
> Yours
> Peter
__.____._
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251

0 comments:

Post a Comment

T r a n s l a t e to your language