Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from madhavspatel on Apr 21 at 5:55 AM Hi Rahil, You can use the same document types and number ranges as in leading ledger. Please note that the number range values can be maintained separately for general ledger view in FAGL_DOCNR. Follow the path this way :- For Document Type. SPRO -- Financial Accounting New -- Financial Accounting Global Settings New -- Document -- Document Types -- Define Doc type for general Ledger View For Number Ranges. SPRO -- Financial Accounting New -- Financial Accounting Global Settings New -- Document -- Document Number ranges -- Define document number ranges for general ledger view ( FAGL_DOCNR ). Thanks, Madhav
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: talharahil Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 3:21 AM Subject: Leading Ledger Document Numbers Do Not Correspond to the Non-Leading Ledger D.Numbers Dear Experts, For the statutory reporting I have created a Non-leading Ledger L1 with the V3 FYV (K4 in leading Ledger) and assigned 4 company codes to it. The requirement was not to split the controlling area as other company codes tagged to the cont.area with FYV-K4 and the BPC module in scope, so whenever we do the posting to the Leading Ledger it should parallelly update in the non-leading ledger. (No Ledger specific postings). As per the requirement I did "Define Document Types for General Ledger View" step and replicated all the document types and number ranges from "Define Document Types for Entry View" now in the testing when I post some initial documents I got the similar document numbers for 0L and L1 but after posting more entries the sequence has been changed and now in the 0L and L1 system is generating different document numbers although I am not doing any ledger specific postings. Based on the above: 1. Is it a correct way to define the document numbers and ranges? Client wants the same number to be generated for both 0L and L1 how can we achieve this? Please reply with your valuable suggestions ASAP as we need to go-live soon with the parallel ledger settings. Thank you. Regards, Rahil. | | Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |