Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from MASchumacher on Apr 1 at 9:59 AM I'm guessing it is a Substitution rule that was done via configuration but the associated code is not complete/acurate for the entries that are configured. Check table entries GB921 to see if you can figure out which one has the value "2LI_1000001" in the CONDID.
Margaret Schumacher
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: R. N. Wilhite
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 7:12 AM
Subject: FI Validation Through GGB0 Gives Syntax Error During MIGO Posting
Have you looked for notes?
Neal |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.   _.____.__ |
