Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from PSD Rajan on Jul 3 at 11:06 AM Continuing where Sridhar left (which is what I had been thinking too)...
1. Is there anything wrong the way the Areas are set up? (Ignoring the
CoD assignment for now).
2. How and why did this requirement come up now?
2. Are there other company codes assigned to the same CoD which have
differing requirements?
Generally, CoD is set up as country specific organization of a set of
Depreciation Areas. Since a year has already gone by, your client may have
to learn to live with it rather than reassign (it is not as simple as
flipping a switch and what Roy mentioned is one of the extreme ways of
fixing it). There is nothing technically wrong with having multiple CoDs
for a country. It may stick out like a sore thumb, but one can live with
it.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Sridhar Shrinivasan
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:18 AM
Subject: Correct and Assign the Company Code to the Correct Chart of Depreciation
Chris,
You mentioned that the company code is in PRODUCTIVE state for an year- does that mean that wrong assignment is not an issue Or the problem was allowed to exist that long?
The wrong chart of depreciation that is assigned - is that being used by other company codes?
Sridhar |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
