Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Hello,
I agree that the payment proposal to simply test which vendor items would block is not a sustainable business process. It is too easy to forget to delete the proposal and get items caught without being paid. It was a work around to address the issue one time. The prudent course of action would be to work the list of vendors and get their changes to sensitive fields approved. In that way, no invoices should block.
However, for going forward, the user could definitely analyze the most recent live payment proposals (perhaps via a review of REGUP) and ascertain which vendor items have been blocked for payment due to changes in master data.
Regards
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: VidhyaDhar
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 7:53 PM
Subject: Unconfirmed vendors with open items
Hi
That is innovative thinking !....To make use of an automatic payment
proposal and identify unconfirmed changes to vendors via a related error
message !. The method would definitely serve the purpose.... But the user
must be careful enough to delete such proposals ; else , the related line
items could remain unpaid in subsequent payment runs even after vendor
changes are confirmed. Therefore, this method is perhaps a work around and
cannot be construed as a full-fledged business process. I hope you agree
with me, FI-RCG...
Regards
VidhyaDhar |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Related Content Most Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight  _.____.__ |
Mark as helpful
