RE: [sap-hr] Sick and Vacation Leave Balances
Posted by
Admin at
|
Share this post:
|
|
0 Comments
 | Posted by Todd on Mar 24 at 4:36 PM |  Mark as helpful |
You may need to check your accumulation in whatever timetype you are using. Given that the person returned to work midway through the payroll period, you may be accumulating on top of the value that remained from when the person went on LOA. If you can, I would look at your time eval log & the value of the timetype on the first day back from LOA.
Cheers,
Todd
From: sap-hr@Groups.ITtoolbox.com
To: twilcox_sap@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:42:09 -0400
Subject: [sap-hr] Sick and Vacation Leave Balances
Posted by SAP12009 (HCM/Payroll Consultant)
on Mar 18 at 10:47 AM
I have an employee that went out on LOA May 8, 2009. He returned to work on March 8, 2010. The return date falls in our currrent pay period 06 2010 which covers 2/26/10 - 3/11/10.
So when the employee returned from LOA there were 4 working days left in the pay period. March 8, 9 ,10 and 11th. The caveat is we have a rule that employees must work minimum 37 hours in a pay period in order to be eligible to receive the bi-weekly sick & vacation quota accrual. This employee did not work minimum 37 hours and the system gave him the bi-weekly quota accrual.
Why would the system give the employee the accrual when it is clear he did not work minimum 37 hours in the current pay period ?
Thanks,
__.____._ Cheers,
Todd
From: sap-hr@Groups.ITtoolbox.com
To: twilcox_sap@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:42:09 -0400
Subject: [sap-hr] Sick and Vacation Leave Balances
Posted by SAP12009 (HCM/Payroll Consultant)
on Mar 18 at 10:47 AM
I have an employee that went out on LOA May 8, 2009. He returned to work on March 8, 2010. The return date falls in our currrent pay period 06 2010 which covers 2/26/10 - 3/11/10.
So when the employee returned from LOA there were 4 working days left in the pay period. March 8, 9 ,10 and 11th. The caveat is we have a rule that employees must work minimum 37 hours in a pay period in order to be eligible to receive the bi-weekly sick & vacation quota accrual. This employee did not work minimum 37 hours and the system gave him the bi-weekly quota accrual.
Why would the system give the employee the accrual when it is clear he did not work minimum 37 hours in the current pay period ?
Thanks,
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
ToddSAP HR Enthusiast
Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements
View this thread online
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
_.____.__ 
