We have added search box. Key in SAP issue keyword to search
TopBottom

Announcement: wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.

Re: [sap-acct] GGB0 Validation Rule Using Sets

Posted by Admin at
Share this post:
Ma.gnolia DiggIt! Del.icio.us Yahoo Furl Technorati Reddit

Posted by PSD Rajan
on Oct 5 at 12:56 PM
Mark this reply as helpfulMark as helpful
Roy,
Your comments echo the same sentiments as in my first response in this
thread. The repect is mutual and our acquaintance goes back to our days
at Eli Lilly.

It is, however, silly or outright ridiculous to assume that writing in
detail about something that one is knowledgeable about will pose a challenge
to one's career and, use that assumption as the reason for one's approach
to responding to queries! As you said, there is enough space for all of us
and probably more. It is the individual's capabilities that differentiates
one from the other.

Further, the references to the awards is definitely sidetracking too.

I don't see any reason for disagreement here, Roy.

Best Regards,
Rajan.


On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Roy B via sap-acct <
sap-acct@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:

> Posted by Roy B(SAP Financials Expert)
> on Oct 5 at 10:37 AM Hi
> PSD Rajan and Waza and others,
>
> no we are not getting sidetracked here. These are important points from
> Waza, and deserve to be discussed. I have the greatest of respect for both
> of you guys (and I must not leave out VidyaDhar either). I agree with Waza
> on a number of points. Many people who write questions on this forum expect
> very full answers, but we, the people who answer, are busy with our own jobs
> and cannot write too much. So we try to write pointers and hope the
> enquirers will go and find out the rest. I, like Waza, taught myself from
> scratch, have never taken a course in SAP although I am a qualified
> accountant and business consultant so I have an academic head start. I
> learned by trying things to see what worked and that is what I think others
> should also do. That does not mean I am against sharing knowledge, as I am
> sure many here would agree. However, I do like to see that someone has tried
> to find the answer before posting here. Then I am more willing to help. If
> someone simply demands answers, sorry, he will get none from me except
> perhaps a very short and not very polite one. I was helped in the early days
> by some more knowledgeable consultants and remember that, so I give
> something back. Also I have been stymied now and then and have posted a
> question or two on the forum, but only after looking long and hard myself
> for the answer.
>
> There is room here all of us and we all have different approaches, so let's
> agree to differ, since that is what makes life interesting.
>
> Regards, Roy
>
> Roy Brookes AFA, FInstBA,
> SAP? Financials Expert
> Senior SAP? Financials Consultant
> Tel: +49 171 268 9635 (mobile)
> Tel: +49 40 793 19642 (landline)
> Skype ID: roystonbrookes
> email@removed
> email@removed
> www.RoyBrookes.com <http://www.roybrookes.com/>
> Published Author
> email@removed
> Director, Software Partner Solutions limited
> www.Software-Partner-Solutions.com<http://www.software-partner-solutions.com/>
> www.linkedin.com/in/roybrookes
> SAP? Expert Index Registration: CRF **42819*
> SAP? Referral Partner for Business One
>
> On 04.10.2010 07:00, PSD Rajan via sap-acct wrote:
> Posted by PSD Rajan
> on Oct 4 at 12:10 PM Mark as helpful
> Are we getting side-tracked here? Agree with your stand about what would
> prompt you to provide the full solution.
> This is the ittoolbox forum where those who know help those who don't. Why
> would one worry about the recognitions through achievement statuses? I
> can't put my achievement status in this board on my resume and expect my
> client to even look at it. So, why bother who gets what.
>
> Sharing knowledge of the SAP functionalities cannot be a threat to anyone's
>
> job security. The more you share, the more you learn. Moreover, you are
> sharing just one small bit of your vast knowledge base. It helps one person
>
> to manage his/her difficult day rather than build a career. To be competing
>
> with you, the person should have the same or more depth and breadth of your
>
> commendable knowledge. I am sure that nobody is going to be competing with
> you for the next contract after learning a trick or two from you. One
> would need a huge lot more than the knowledge that one gains from this
> board
> to be a good consultant. Since I seldom implement the same solution again,
> which generally are extremely complex, I have always felt at ease doing as
> detailed a knowledge transfer as possible so that I wouldn't need to
> revisit it later while I am engaged on a different challenge. What you have
>
> done in the past helps others to judge what you can do in the future.
>
> Let us put all those distractions aside and keep helping as we can!
> Regards,
> Rajan.
>
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:00 AM, wnash7658 via sap-acct <
> sap-acct@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Posted by wnash7658 (SAP Specialist
> > and Leader)
> > on Oct 3 at 8:56 PM
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > Putting this on the careers forum might be the best place.
> >
> > When I can see that somebody has put the effort in or that I am also
> > interested in improving my abailities, then I give the full-bodied
> solution.
> >
> >
> > I guess this why I like SDN, you can see someone has asked 100 questions
> > and yet there are no forum points. In ITToolbox 100 questions means you
> > become bronze and if you post the most on the forum for the month you
> > suddenly become the leader .. sorry I disagree.
> >
> > Further, SAP is a career, it is not a job for a short time. Therefore you
>
> > need to protect it. We are competing with each other for the next
> contract,
> > though as you can see by my post I am still willling to help others.
> Lastly,
> > I started out the same as you VidhyaDhar, no resources, no one willing
> > assist, but I never gave up and showed enough logic and aptitude to go
> > further with my chosen career.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Waza
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------Original Message---------------
> > From: rchoi90495
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:14 PM
> > Subject: GGB0 Validation Rule Using Sets
> >
> > > I am trying to create a GGB0 validation rule using sets. I need to have
>
> > the rule give an error whenever a cost center in a set is attempting to
> post
> > on a GL account in another set. Any assistance would be greatly
> appreciated.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Robert

__.____._
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
PSD Rajan
SAP Accounting Enthusiast

Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
Related Content
White Papers

In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com for iPhone: Ask Questions & Get Answers Anywhere. Use the New iPhone App
_.____.__

0 comments:

Post a Comment

T r a n s l a t e to your language