We have added search box. Key in SAP issue keyword to search
TopBottom

Announcement: wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.

RE:[sap-log-mm] Return Againist A Vendor PO

Posted by Admin at
Share this post:
Ma.gnolia DiggIt! Del.icio.us Yahoo Furl Technorati Reddit

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on Jul 3 at 10:37 PM
Mark this reply as helpfulMark as helpful
Hi Soulman,

In most cases, any return of delivery to the vendor does not require any ''cost return'' for freight component which is debited as soon as the first GR document is posted (and this is applied when the PO is maintained with planned cost). Therefore, the GR cancellation with movement type 122 is not used in this particular case but return PO.

When the return PO is raised, a couple of questions shall be also clarified on -

1) Who shall bear the transport cost (if any); and
2) If such transport cost shall be credited to the material stock account.

Answering these questions will determine how the transport cost is maintained in the return PO.

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Bsrshekar
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:51 AM
Subject: Return Againist A Vendor PO

> In a similar case we have processed MIGO with movement type 161,
> How do we debit the Vendor, in this case we also have to debit incedental charges like freight etc, which is captured in the PO header

__.____._
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast

Contributed 500 posts in a group to earn a Silver Achievement
_.____.__

0 comments:

Post a Comment

T r a n s l a t e to your language