Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from Carlos on Feb 5 at 10:50 PM Potential risk would be for someone to create a fictitious invoice and cover it up with a transfer posting. Why someone would do that? An example could be a sales rep trying to meet period end sales quota and transfers a non relevant material to cover it up with. It is really easy to cover up inventory movements with a material that may not even have value in books, i.e. Discarded furniture, obsolete it or comm equipment, etc.
The way to mitigate is to use the standard mm-pur functionality where instead of using mb1b, you use a PO (transfer posting option) via me21n, authorize via workflow, and transfer using migo. If you must use mb1b you can limit by restricting storage location/warehouse, at the role or user group level.
Now, that being said, I would love to hear why you have a user that needs both tcodes to do their job?
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: SAPSOD
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 6:30 AM
Subject: Does a SOD (Segragation Of Duties) Conflict Exist Between SAP VF01 and MB1B Transactions?
We currently have a SOX matrix which identified a conflict of segregation of duties between VF01 (Billing) and MB1B (Warehouse Transfer) transactions.
We want to understand what would be the conflict so we can establish mitigation actions if necessary. |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.   _.____.__ |
