Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from CHRJS on Apr 10 at 8:53 AM Hi Robert,
I suggest you to use a CO substitution rule.
Regards,
Christian
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Robert Casey
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 9:41 AM
Subject: Manual update of COEP, COVP
Has anyone ever tried a manual update of the SGTXT field in table(s) COEP or COVP? We use a substitution rule to populate the SGTXT field during order settlement. One of the order types wasn't configured properly (CO Partner Update was partly active, not active) so the PARTNER OBJECT field wasn't populated properly, which caused the substitution to not work properly.
Some of these settlement documents go back several periods and the business doesn't want to execute the reverse / repost settlement steps. They'd prefer a different solution.
What we're thinking is a straight update of the SGTXT field, replacing what's in there with what the text ought to have been from the beginning.
Any ideas? Programs? Guidance? Any and all advice gratefully accepted.
Thanks,
BC |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
