Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from ha_tran on Feb 18 at 12:20 AM Hi,
If Vendor 2 is only playing the "OA" ordering address of Vendor 1, then you will only assign Vendor 2 with related "OA" partner function in the vendor master of Vendor 1. In respect of Vendor 2 master, you don't need to maintain the partner function "OA" with Vendor 1. Secondly, as Vendor 2 does not involve in any payment, the company code view is not required to be maintained.
Cheers,
HT
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Logistiker
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 2:03 PM
Subject: Vendor Partner Role Configuration
Hi MM Guys,
I have a bit of a conundrum. We have been using SAP for a few years now and I am not convinced our Vendor partner role configuration is correct or maybe I am missing sth?
We have typically VN role, with OA and the usual payer/supplier, etc. roles. My main issue lies with the VN and OA roles. We have many vendors who have different addresses depending on their role but usually it is the setup that Vendor A only wants us to order at OA address (different from VN).
Now I know I need a new partner number to reflect the different address but do I really have to set each of these as a "vendor" VN role? Also all our roles have the same number range. This is making life difficult for our Purchasing department to know which "vendor" number to call up when ordering something. They typically call up the shortcut =h. and then part of the vendor name and can get several partner numbers and addresses but cannot tell which of these is the real vendor and which is just an ordering address.
Can someone help me on this?
Thanks,
Logistiker |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
