Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from Anupam_Yamdagni on Jul 20 at 3:07 AM Two types of clearing possible: 1. Residual Clearing: which result in clearing of Advance of Rs. 100000 & Invoice of Rs. 70000 with a resultant adjustment (Type AB) Posted for Rs. 30000 on the date of clearing. (Aging report will recognize clearing date as date of transaction) 2. Partial Clearing: Which mark the fact that Rs. 70000 is partially adjusted against advance of Rs. 100000, both documents still appear in open document, however, aging reports of modified that it shows advance of Rs. 30000 (aging based on advance date). Partial clearing recognise the fact that Invoice is adjusted against advance, but still shows both documents open in vendor account, unless advance is fully settled.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Dipti Thakur Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 3:05 AM Subject: Validation for T code F-44 Dear All, Can anybody help me writing the validation fort code F-44 Scenario: If a vendor has a OTP of Rs. 100000/- and against that the invoice is of Rs. 70000/- .If user wants to clear those 2 documents through T code f-44, user double click on Difference posting tab & systemaccepts the debit balance and post the entry with doc type AB Rs.30000/- debit still in open item in vendor ledger. I want to write a validation *Prerequisite* BKPF-BUKRS = '1000' AND SYST-TCODE = 'F-44' * **Check* RF05A-DIFFB in SYST-TCODE= F-44, RF05A-AKOBT in SYST-TCODE= F-44 not equal to SHKZG = S (If the amount in *RF05A-AKOBT* is minus i.e debit system should not allow the user to post the AB doc) Can anybody help me in getting the standard User Exit for the same? Thanks & Regards Dipti | | Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |