Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from sheffeld on Aug 3 at 8:36 AM If the wording you provide is what was actually said, my experience
tells me that the most likely issue is an SoD (Segregation/Separation of
Duties) conflict. That conflict would be defined by whatever process or
software your organization uses for compliance (Sarbanes-Oxley, HIPAA,
etc.).
There are several options for resolving this issue, depending upon how
critical the need for the user in question to have both of these
transaction codes and the risk management strategy in your organization.
I would approach your SAP Security resources and ask which options may
be available to you.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Pauoo
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 10:53 PM
Subject: Whether FB60 (Posting Option) And FV50 (Parking Option) Can Be Assigned To A Single User
Our Basis team is saying that they cannot assign both posting option (FB60) and parking option (FV50) to a single user because of some object conflict. In general they are saying both posting and parking option cannot be assigned to a single user. Kindly give input with technical details
Reply from sheffeld on Aug 2 at 9:11 PM Most certainly they can. Either assign a role to the user that contains both transaction codes or create a role and assign both transaction codes to that role and assign it to the user.
What is the issue you are experiencing that motivated your question?
- |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.   _.____.__ |
