Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from henrileconte on Apr 9 at 2:04 PM Thank you so much Sridhar.
I do have costs posted vs the Internal Order in Co Code SGD1 (Crcy SGD).
I also tried processing via KKA1 and KO88 for single Internal Order. When I process KKA1 I get an informational message 'Results Analysis Data not changed' and when I process KO88 I keep getting the message 'KD256 There are no accrued amounts...'. If I do the exact same process in the other Company Code GBP1 (with different Currency GBP) I have no problem at all and it processes perfectly. I'm a bit puzzled on what could be different between these two setups.
Thanks again.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: henrileconte
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 12:30 PM
Subject: Internal Order Settlement Not Possible
Hello gurus
I hope you can help. We have two company codes GBP1 and SGD1 In GBP1 they are both under the same Controlling Area.
In Co Code GBP1 we set up an Internal Order and posted several FI documents against it, at month end we processed KKAI and then KO8G to settle the postings vs the Internal Order. Everything is processed correctly.
WE then set up an exact same Internal Order for the other Company Code SGD1 and when we try to process the Settlement we get the message Message no. KD256 There are no accrued amounts. As I mentioned before, the Internal Orders have the exact same set up (same Order Type, similar Cost Centers, same Int Order Status, Same Results Analysis Key, Similar Settlement Rule set up).
Any suggestions as to what may be different between these two company codes that make the settlement process behave differently?
Thanks,
Henri |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
