Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from raghunathanc on Feb 2 at 12:10 AM Dear Santosh
I think the retro aspect may be only reflecting in the payslip, as the previous month salary was processed and posted correctly in books of accounts.
Kindly check the posting results (check posting entry) before experimenting further.
Thanks
Raghunathan
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Santosh Mohanty
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:20 AM
Subject: Infotype 0009 (Bank Details) related Issue
Dear All,
Employee joins the Organization in 14.12.2011 by that time user did not maintained the IT 0009. Paid the salary for Dec. 2011 now for Jan. 2012 they maintained the IT 0009 from 14.12.2011.By running the payroll for Jan. 2012 the net amount reflects both months salary(Salary for Dec. 2011plus salary for Jan. 2012).
My question is how can I nullify the last month Retro effect.
Do I need to do anything with technical wage type /566.
Please guide me.
Thanks,
Santosh |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.  _.____.__ |
