Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from Ken Zamiska on Jan 27 at 3:43 PM Thanks for the reply. Actually there was no PO associated with the transaction, only a material movement document. That was one of my questions, do all Consignment Settlement documents need a PO? We have partner functions established in our vendor master so that we can have multi Ordering Addresses/Goods Supplier (OA/GS) to one Partner. We also may have multiple Remit To. They are all linked at the Partner functions at the Purchasing view of the vendor. So the Material Document associated with the movement had the (2) Vendor, the OA/GS) and the does not have a recon acct. The recon account is the GL Acct AP Trade. It is only at the (1) Remit to vendor level...but all 3 are linked.
So to recap:
Do we need a PO to settle consignment usage?
And then we would link the (2) & (1) on the PO to post the invoice.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Ken
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: ROCCO TUCCELLA
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 1:38 PM
Subject: Consignment Settlement / Vendor Recon Account Error
Hello,
As I can understand the problem could be related to the vendor used in purchase order.
For me main vendor is the vendor
- having reconciliation account and used in FI-AP accounting
- used in consignment record info
- used in consignment stock management.
1st question: Purchase Order vendor is main vendor ?
2nd question: Vendor used in consignment stock management is main vendor ?
If not I think you used wrong vendor code in Purchase Order.
Hoping this helps you, if useful please mark as helpful.
Regards,
Rocco |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |  _.____.__ |
