We have added search box. Key in SAP issue keyword to search
TopBottom

Announcement: wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.

RE:[sap-hr] Not Taking Claim on a Particular Wagetype for CA

Posted by Admin at
Share this post:
Ma.gnolia DiggIt! Del.icio.us Yahoo Furl Technorati Reddit

Reply from Peterhood on Dec 29 at 12:03 AM
Hmm Thanks Jagan, but that wont apply to my case. The Claim is actually correct and is coming from a previous period. I do not want to avoid the claim from being created, nor I want to delete it-- I just want to make it "skip" this run. I have created a PCR by now to make the WT skip the cumulation to /101, and the arrears and claim part, and then create the wagetypes it would have created otherwise. But I'm afraid it might cause problems in the future, specially with HRSPs. l was hoping to find a more standard way.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Peterhood
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:15 PM
Subject: Not Taking Claim on a Particular Wagetype for CA

I have this problem I need to find a solution for. There is one earning/bonus wagetype that should always be paid on total amount, and it is not desired/legal to have a claim affect it. However, I have not been able to find any place on the configuration to allow me do this (I´m able to make arrears not deduct from it)..
Example 1:
There is a previous claim existing for 400 (/561 = 400)
I have a this Bonus XXXX payment, for 1000 entered for example on IT0267, and it needs to ignore claims.
I need the payment to the employee to be exactly those 1000 (ignore taxes for example), however, the systems gets the claim into account and pays 600 instead.
Also, the claim should not be eliminated, it should be kept for next run.

Example 2:
I have both the XXXX wt for 1000 and an additional bonus YYYY for 300 that can actually be affected by the claim, so:
/561 = 400
XXXX = 1000
YYYY = 1300

As YYYY can be affected by the claim, the expected result would be to have the system pay 1000 for bonus XXXX, 0 for bonus YYYY and keep a claim of 100 for next period.

Has anyone faced this? Maybe is not configured on tables and need particular rules, and in such case I would like some advice on what have you done before.

 
Reply to this email to post your response.
 
__.____._
Manage Settings | Unsubscribe | Create FAQ | Send Feedback
  
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Peterhood  
 
Mark as helpful
View this online
Ask a new question
 
In the Spotlight
Have you explored the Toolbox.com Marketplace? Learn more and access a free course now.

_.____.__

0 comments:

Post a Comment

T r a n s l a t e to your language