Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
It based on the requirement you have. For a single payment either you run F-53 and then update cheque no allocation later with FCH5. Rather, It is better to use F-58 where cheque print will be done at the same time. But as per me F110 usage is where you are going to pay for a lot/batch few nos of Vendors at the same time since effort to run F110 is not feasible for a single document. Rest is your choice whether u run F-53/F-58 or F110. regards _____________________ Subhendu This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the use of the above named addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it immediately and notify us by e-mail or telephone.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: effurun Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 2:32 AM Subject: Why use F-53 when I can pay through F110 instead? Exactly Don. You can actually use F110 to run single payments. Just as pointed out by you, I have asked my clients to ignore F-53 completely, as their current requirement does not include Cheque payments! No one would be assigned that transaction code, and none would be trained on it either. I am also recommending the use of FVB1, and FVB0 for posting transactions relating to transfer of funds between bank accounts. I guess I'll stick to F110 for now. Thanks guys! I'm enriched..... | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Subhendu G SAP Accounting Helper
Posted helpful replies on 5 threads in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |