Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Norva
If your client has a payment card service then I would try to use that
system to maintain detail history rather than SAP. I assume that you will get a
periodic charge from the payment card supplier and a single invoice to
match the charge for the period in total. I also assume that your clients
accountants simply wish to treat this single payment as a charge to a single
overhead account in the P&L as a contra entry to the bank account charge,
which is fine from a bookkeeping viewpoint, but not from an analytical
viewpoint.
Where the purchase is through a credit card, then I would use FB60 and go
through to FI with the card holder as the vendor in the case of the purchase
being treated through an "personal expenses" system. You can use the text
and reference fields for the invoice entry but you will probably have to
bespoke a routine to extract these fields for analysis purposes - the
downside is that these fields are not "controlled" fields therefore you may find
any summation of the detail difficult.
Paul Massey
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Norva
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:59 AM
Subject: Can we create a PO without GR/IR, without link to FI at all?
Hi gurus,
The question sounds silly, but our client does ask for the possibility.
Some materials ( computer, office supply) are purchased by Visa, currently no PO is created for that, FI AP upload a journal entry every month based on the transaction from bank.
now they are thinking to use a kind of PO ( or something like PO) to record the purchasing history, but not to impact FI at all, which means no GR, no IR, and no commitment. purchase req. is not an option because it create commitment as well.
any thoughts?
thanks
Norva |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight  _.____.__ |
