Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
I think I have another alternative...If you don't want to change structures, (as many times you can't do that) you could create a macro that is used to clear all the fields - or move the same value - does not matter what value, but if it's always the same, then clearing or assigning a the same value behaves almost the same in sorts, at new, at end, ...
define ignorefieldsinstructure.
clear: field1, field2, field3, ...fieldn.
end-of-definition.
then when you're assigning values (or just before you use that structure,
fieldwithvalue1 = ....
...
fieldwitvaluyen = ...
** call macro to ignorefields
ignorefieldsinstructure.
append / insert / collect or whatever you want to do with that structure.
as all those fields have exactly the same value for each name, then they do not change sorts ...
HTH and Hope its clear :)
Horacio
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: robphelan
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:35 AM
Subject: INCLUDE STRUCTURE - inverse declaration
Yes.. that was something we did on our last project.
We have our main table structure made up of 6 different include structures? That way, we could piece together new layouts when necessary |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| |  horacio zapettini
SAP Development Helper
Posted helpful replies on 5 threads in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement Most Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight  _.____.__ |
