Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
ECC 6.0 and NETWEAVER 7.01 , I am planning right now for ECC PRD , BI landscape with EP as mentioned in the post... Regards ---------------Original Message--------------- From: mark_me Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 8:20 AM Subject: Disk space recommendations > Again I am dependent on the group, I need to have your thoughts on the current disk sizing for Oracle files ( sapdata, archive + logs ) which I have planned for different products with EHP's and suggest if I am required to consider the increase in disk space. > > ECC EHP4 DEV : 400 GB ( sapdata , archive +logs ) , after client creation 130 GB is free > ECC EHP4 QAS : 400 GB ( sapdata, archive +logs) , after client creation 150 GB is free . > ECC EHP4 PRD : yet to install , assuming 500 GB (sapdata) + 100 GB ( archive +log files) > > BW +EP EHP1 DEV : 200 GB for BI ( sapdata , log files ) , 50 GB for EP > * Here what would be the best way to design landscape considering the BW EHP1 ( 2 SID's on same BOX) > 1. Have MCOD installation for BW ( 2 SID's) and another DB for EP instance on same box. > 2. Use BW JAVA instance for EP usage and skip the separate installation of EP and single DB with MCOD. > > BW +EP EHP1 QAS : 400 GB for BI ( sapdata , log files ) , 100 GB for EP > BW EHP1 PRD: 500 GB for BI ( sapdata , log files ) > > Please suggest as per your experience which landscape design for BW and EP would be better and are the disk size proper? | __.____._ Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | _.____.__ |