Re: [sap-hr] Size of T52STH solution to purge/archive this table?
Posted by
Admin at
|
Share this post:
|
|
0 Comments
 | Posted by cool_dude2kin (Consultant) on Aug 13 at 4:12 PM |  Mark as helpful |
Luiz, The program does delete the entries in T52STH as well. Make sure you enter the selections in the "delete" box as well on H99UCDP0.
Regards,
Kevin.
________________________________
From: lfsalvi via sap-hr <sap-hr@Groups.ITtoolbox.com>
To: cool_dude2kin <cool_dude2kin@yahoo.co.in>
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:47:36 AM
Subject: RE: [sap-hr] Size of T52STH solution to purge/archive this table?
Posted by lfsalvi (HR)
on Aug 13 at 1:56 PM Mark as helpful
Kevin,
How can i delete that?
Please correct if i`m mistaken, but the H99UCDP0 does not delete T52STH.
Thanks and regards,
Luiz Salvi
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:38:16 -0700
From: sap-hr@Groups.ITtoolbox.com
Subject: RE: [sap-hr] Size of T52STH solution to purge/archive this table?
To: fs83@hotmail.com
Posted by cool_dude2kin (Consultant)
on Aug 13 at 12:28 AM
Mark as helpful
Why not delete the old processes in PUST?!
I am sure no body will ever need to review the
statistics of very old processes!! Are the
background jobs and the spools associated with thsese old
processes still retained?! If not, the entries in T52ST and
T52STH themselves doesn't offer much value.
--Kevin.
lfsalvi via sap-hr wrote:
> Toolbox sap-hr
> Posted by lfsalvi (HR) on Aug 12 at 3:57 PM
> We use the process model(pust) to run payroll, and we are facing an issue with the size of T52STH table. Currently with 300 million entries. Does anyone had that problem before? Is there any standard solution to purge/archive this table? Thanks and regards,
__.____._ Regards,
Kevin.
________________________________
From: lfsalvi via sap-hr <sap-hr@Groups.ITtoolbox.com>
To: cool_dude2kin <cool_dude2kin@yahoo.co.in>
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:47:36 AM
Subject: RE: [sap-hr] Size of T52STH solution to purge/archive this table?
Posted by lfsalvi (HR)
on Aug 13 at 1:56 PM Mark as helpful
Kevin,
How can i delete that?
Please correct if i`m mistaken, but the H99UCDP0 does not delete T52STH.
Thanks and regards,
Luiz Salvi
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:38:16 -0700
From: sap-hr@Groups.ITtoolbox.com
Subject: RE: [sap-hr] Size of T52STH solution to purge/archive this table?
To: fs83@hotmail.com
Posted by cool_dude2kin (Consultant)
on Aug 13 at 12:28 AM
Mark as helpful
Why not delete the old processes in PUST?!
I am sure no body will ever need to review the
statistics of very old processes!! Are the
background jobs and the spools associated with thsese old
processes still retained?! If not, the entries in T52ST and
T52STH themselves doesn't offer much value.
--Kevin.
lfsalvi via sap-hr wrote:
> Toolbox sap-hr
> Posted by lfsalvi (HR) on Aug 12 at 3:57 PM
> We use the process model(pust) to run payroll, and we are facing an issue with the size of T52STH table. Currently with 300 million entries. Does anyone had that problem before? Is there any standard solution to purge/archive this table? Thanks and regards,
Copyright © 2009 CEB Toolbox, Inc. and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Related Content
In the Spotlight
White Papers
In the Spotlight
How Can Predictive Analytics Drive Competitive Advantage? Find out here
View this thread online
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
_.____.__ 
