Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Question from Logistiker on Nov 25 at 4:08 PM Hi MM Experts, I have noticed that we have some old contracts where date has expired by a few years and yet they appear in the ME92F orME92K transaction as being valid to create an AUFB message to vendor. Just like our purchase orders we use order acknowledgment confirmation and even a confirmation control key. If I remove the confirmation indicator from the contract then this will no longer appear in the above transactions. I am pretty sure that for purchase orders the system behaves differently. Is there a systematic way of the system acknowledging the contract period has expired despite an order acknowledgment requirement? Thanks | Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today. _.____.__ |