Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from Alex Ayers on Aug 3 at 2:17 AM Hi,
This is not a technical problem but a policy one. I assume that the
basis team perform a segregation of duties analysis and this combination
brings a conflict based on the rules configured by your organisation. Your
internal policy prevents the assignment, this is (probably) not a technical
restriction. Speak to the risk / ruleset owner (potentially an internal
controls or internal audit function) to understand the rationale and
possible mitigating controls if this is actually required.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Pauoo
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 10:53 PM
Subject: Whether FB60 (Posting Option) And FV50 (Parking Option) Can Be Assigned To A Single User
Our Basis team is saying that they cannot assign both posting option (FB60) and parking option (FV50) to a single user because of some object conflict. In general they are saying both posting and parking option cannot be assigned to a single user. Kindly give input with technical details
Reply from sheffeld on Aug 2 at 9:11 PM Most certainly they can. Either assign a role to the user that contains both transaction codes or create a role and assign both transaction codes to that role and assign it to the user.
What is the issue you are experiencing that motivated your question?
- |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
