Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from Nikki Klein on Dec 29 at 1:31 PM Hi Rene
Do all these assets belong to one company code, and / or to one chart of depreciation? Are there identifiable consistencies in terms of which asset classes are posting depreciation correctly, and which asset classes are not?
I assume that transaction code ACSET shows that you have KOSTL assigned by company code and depreciation area. Also that KOSTL has been activated as an account assignment object.
If you display your Depreciation Expense cost element, is there a default Cost Center assigned there (KA03); or is there possibly a default one configured into OKB9?
I'm sure you are looking at all of these, but it helps us to know where to start looking too.
Nikki
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Rene Esquivel
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 10:46 PM
Subject: Posting Depreciation by Cost Center
We've got several account determination codes defined with the Expense account for ordinary depreciation defined and the accounts assigned are defined as cost elements with cost element category "1", also we´ve got defined in SPRO that Cost Center (KOSTL) should be considered for all the asset transection type with * in that field, however when AFAB transaction is run, only one of the defined cost elements is posted with cost center field and the other cost elements are posted without the cost center field.
Does anybody know why only one of the defined cost elements is posted with the cost center field? is that a problem with the configuration in SPRO or, dos it have to do with the definition of the cost elements. We have reviewed SPRO transaction several times an don't find what the problem could be, please help with some hints to solve it, we will appreciate your reply |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
