Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from Praveenbm on Oct 2 at 2:43 PM Hi,
Is that the sub-assembly material is created as valuated material type or
non valuated? I have few point which may help you
1. You can use mov.type 501 (Receipt without PO) to take stock of that
material, but i hope there would be a FI accounting entry in this process.
or create a Z movement type if things didn't work out
2. Move stock into plant A with no value. Stock account is zero. Stock
valuation (MBEW) in plant A is zero but stock is 1.
Move from plant A to plant B (same company code) with 301 movement. Stock
account is still net zero (in and out of same company code). Stock
valuation in plant B is standard price (for example) with stock of 1 but
stock valuation in plant A is NEGATIVE standard price with a stock of zero.
This can affect your MM period close which will abort unless you have the
"Allow negative values" flag ticked and will stay like this until you do a
stock revaluation in plant A.
Thanks
Praveen B M
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Muralidhar Lanka
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:59 AM
Subject: Valuated Project Stock Indicator With Multiple WBS Elements
Dear All,
Please see if you can provide some help with these questions:
- If the project is setup for valuated project stock indicator, with
multiple WBS elements in the hierarchy, each assigned to different sales
order line items, is it possible to overwrite the behavior in the one of
the project WBS elements to non-valuated stock through the requirements
class in the sales order? I think there is an option in the requirements
class that calls out the valuated/non-valuated behavior, but I am not sure
if it will work when a project is involved and conflicts with this setting.
- We have multiple legal entities and the company that owns the contract
with the end customer wants to procure one of the subassemblies from
another company within the group. The current solution here for such work
is to use a cross-company STO, where the supplying company completes the
subassembly using make-to-stock production orders and delivers to the
requesting company. However, the issue is that the cost of this delivery is
huge and if we are using valuated stock, this sub-assembly is consumed in a
production order and the cost does not hit the project until the production
order is complete. Is there any way to make this sub-assembly material
non-valuated?
- In a slight variation of the previous scenario, if either the
supplying company or the receiving company is valuated, while the other is
non-valuated, does the CC-STO work?
Best Regards,
Muralidhar Lanka
My Blog: http://sapthinktank.blogspot.com/ |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
