Reply from BobbyGoel on Sep 3 at 7:05 AM Thanks but not specific to this issue.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: ASHOKAKUMAR MEHER
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 5:17 AM
Subject: IT 584-Interest On Housing Loan-Maximum Limit 200,000 System Not Reading
Please refer to the below mentioned all notes for Budget changes:
Note Number
2041819
Topic
PY-IN: Union Budget Changes for Year 2014
Version 3
Validity 21.07.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 22.07.2014 11:07:32
Priority Correction with high priority
This Note delivers the changes related to the Union Budget for 2014, as announced through Note 2041635.
Courtesy SAP
....
Note Number
2044889
Topic
Union Budget Changes 2014 for Employee NPS Limit
Version 1
Validity 22.07.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 22.07.2014 11:05:04
Priority Correction with high priority
This Note delivers the change related to employee NPS limit under Section 80CCD(1) as per Union Budget for 2014. The limit for 80CCD(1) shall not exceed INR 1 Lakh and this legal change was announced through SAP Note 2041635.
Courtesy SAP
.......
Note Number
2016551
Topic
HINCF24C: Runtime error in utility program
Version 3
Validity 26.06.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 26.06.2014 15:16:36
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing the utility program HINCF24C (TCode: PC00_M40_F24C) to consolidate the e-file generated from the Form 24Q report for the employees working in your organization.
When you are executing the report to merge files into a single consolidation file having more than 99999 records, the report crashes with a runtime error.
Courtesy SAP
.......
Note Number
1974303
Topic
HINCESI0: Missing header text in the ALV display
Version 2
Validity 25.06.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 25.06.2014 16:00:17
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing the report HINCESI0 (TCode: PC00_M40_ESIF) for the employees working in your organization.
While executing the monthly report for the employees, the header text in the ALV output is missing.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number
2000872
Topic
AFY: Issue with Previous employment details
Version 2
Validity 06.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 24.06.2014 16:07:33
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing payroll program HINCALC0 (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization with Alternate Financial Year (AFY) switch enabled for all employees.
On executing payroll, it is observed that previous employment details are appearing incorrectly.
Courtesy SAP
...
2021784
Topic
HINCF160: Section 80CCD Value Repeating For Employees on Form-16
Version 2
Validity 04.06.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 04.06.2014 16:25:17
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing Form-16 for employee's within the organization. In your payroll you are using NPS (National Pension System) solution. However, while executing Form-16 for a particular employee having NPS values in payroll, Form-16 repeats the same amount for other employee's under Point No. 9 (A)(a) & Point No. 9(c) for section 80CCD(1) & 80CCD(2) respectively.
Courtesy SAP
.........
Note Number
2025812
Topic
Form 24Q: Employee category is incorrect in ANNEXURE II (Salary and Tax details)
Version 1
Validity 03.06.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 04.06.2014 16:20:28
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing transaction PC00_M40_F24Q (Report HINCF24Q) for 4th quarter in your organization, for few cases employee category is appearing inconsistent in " salary and tax details" (ANNEXURE II):
Case 1: If Employee is attaining age of 60 on the same day as the last day of the financial year, then in ANNEXURE II employee category is not shown as senior citizen.
Example: Employee's date of birth is 31.03.1955, in this case employee is attaining age of 60 exactly on the last day of FY2014 (31.03.2015). So employee category should be shown as 'S'(Senior citizen) in the ANNEXURE II.
Case 2: If employee dies before attaining age of 60 in the same financial year, then in ANNEXURE II employee category is shown as senior citizen.
Example: Employee's date of birth is 13.01.1955, employee's death date is 04.11.2014.In this case employee dies before ataining age of 60 in the same financial year. So employee category should not be shown as 'S' (Senior Citizen) in the ANNEXURE II.
Courtesy SAP
.........
Note Number
2016488
Topic
EDLI: Rounding to Nearest Rupee and Basis Limited to Maximum of INR 6500
Version 1
Validity 13.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 30.05.2014 11:45:15
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization. Certain employees contribute towards EDLI along with the PF and pension contribution. Following inconsistencies have been observed for the EDLI contribution:
The Employer's EDLI contribution and admin charges were not rounded off
The basis for EDLI contribution was not limited to a maximum of INR 6500
Courtesy SAP
...........
Note Number
2020266
Topic
HINCF160: Change for Tax Credit and Surcharge
Version 2
Validity 23.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 23.05.2014 18:35:38
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing Form 16 generation report HINCF160 (TCode: PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.
Form 16 gets generated separated as Part A and Part B.
Only Part B is generated from SAP system. Currently, in Part-B, point number '12.Tax on Total Income', does not include the impact of 'Tax credit' or 'Surcharge' amounts.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number
2012740
Topic
HINCF160: Mailing Pan wise Downloaded Part-A & Part-B of Form-16
Version 2
Validity 23.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Advance development
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 23.05.2014 17:26:01
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing Form 16 report (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization. However with the latest guidelines issued by CCA (Controller of Certifying Authorities) under Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Hardware Cryptographic Token are to be used for digitally signing the documents in case the .PFX signature file is invalid.
With this the Part-A downloaded from TRACES and the Part-B generated from SAP system will be digitally signed externally using the valid digital signature certificate issued by certification agency.
Currently there is no provision in SAP system to download Control Log without enabling digital signature scenario. Also the system has no provision to handle Form-16 mailing scenario for Part-A & Part-B when downloaded and signed externally.
Courtesy SAP
........
Note Number
2008933
Topic
Length of Name & Address Of Employer on Form 12BA(SAP Script)
Version 1
Validity 24.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 23.05.2014 12:07:56
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are generating Form 16 (Tcode: PC00_M40_F16) for employees at your organization. The 'Name and Address of Organization' appears on Form 12BA of Form 16. The name and address of your organization is larger than the length which has been provided on standard Form 16. Due to this, the details which appear on Form 16 are not complete.
Courtesy SAP
.....
Note Number
1945995
Topic
HINCF160: Form 16 PAN Download and Email scenarios
Version 4
Validity 23.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Advance development
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 23.05.2014 16:52:07
Priority Correction with medium priority
This note includes changes for Form 16 download by PAN number and Email scenarios.
Courtesy SAP
........
Note Number
2020848
Topic
Error message "No entry in table T511K for key 40 CRPRO" while running cross FY retro in 2014
Version 1
Validity 22.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 22.05.2014 16:48:13
Priority Correction with medium priority
While running a cross FINANCIAL year retro in the current financial year i.e. 2014, an error message " No entry in table T511k for key 40 CRPRO" is appearing.
Courtesy SAP
.....
Note Number
2014693
Topic
HINCF24Q: Inconsistency in e-file validation for Q4
Version 1
Validity 08.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 09.05.2014 08:21:06
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing Form 24Q report HINCF24Q (Tcode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.
While executing the report for the fourth quarter with scenarios of tax credit & section 89 relief , e-file is generated inconsistenty and error occurs in the file validation utility.
Courtesy SAP
......
Note Number
2014677
Topic
Form 24 Q : Date format is incorrect for "Salary and Tax details" ( ANNEXURE II ) when downloaded to Excel
Version 1
Validity 08.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 08.05.2014 13:10:34
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing transaction code PC00_M40_F24Q ( Report HINCF24Q ) for your organization for fourth quarter. When you are trying to download the ANNEXURE II ( Salary and tax details ) into Excel , the date format is not DDMMYYYY. Altrhough when the file is downloaded as a text file the date format is correct which is DDMMYYYY.
Courtesy SAP
......
Note Number
1393999
Topic
Customer Specific Text / Global ID / Employee No. on Form 16
Version 2
Validity 08.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Advance development
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 08.05.2014 08:19:43
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are having global Id along with the personnel number in your organization for employees. Now you are executing Form 16 (Transaction code - PC00_M40_F16) for an employee with the global id and personnel number.
While generating Form 16 for employees, personnel number is coming on the header of each page on form 16. You should be able to print global ID or any customer specific text, as per your requirement, instead of the personnel number.
Courtesy SAP
......
Note Number
2010149
Topic
HINCF24Q : Inconsistency in background processing with TAN based reporting
Version 2
Validity 06.05.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 06.05.2014 15:41:04
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing Form 24Q report HINCF24Q (Tcode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for employees working in your organization. The 'TAN based reporting' switch is active in the system.
While executing the report in the background, the report execution fails.
Courtesy SAP
.......
1911305
Topic
ECR : PF details should be blank in case of Exempted Trust
Version 3
Validity 30.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 30.04.2014 16:29:26
Priority Correction with high priority
While you are trying to generate ECR (Transaction PC00_M40_EPF) for employees in your organization, if employee is contributing towards an Exempted Trust, only pension details need to be displayed on ECR. PF details are to be left blank for such cases.
For reference:
Employee 'X' in contributing towards an exempted trust. While you generate ECR for such an employee, only pension details need to be displayed on ECR, PF details are to be left blank in such case.
Courtesy SAP
......
Note Number
1937001
Topic
HINCREMS: Incorrect date in status report
Version 4
Validity 30.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 30.04.2014 15:57:25
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing claims status report program HINCREMS (TCode: PC00_M40_REMS) for the employees working in your organization.
While executing for employees having 'quarterly' cumulation of claims, the begin date in the status report is incorrectly displayed.
Courtesy SAP
........
Note Number
2008422
Topic
INBTD: Tax on Regular Bonus Payments Inconsistent
Version 2
Validity 25.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 29.04.2014 13:27:54
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization. The employees have certain bonus payments in first period of the FINANCIAL year, and you are using INBTD functionality to determine tax rate for those bonus payments. In such cases, the tax amount is not coming correct.
For Reference:
Employee 'X' has certain bonus amount of INR 3,00,000 to be paid during regular payroll run for April 2014. His regular projected salary for the FINANCIAL year is INR 8,00,000. In order to determine the tax rate on such bonus payments, the total salary is determined. In current case, the total salary becomes INR 11,00,000 and hence the tax rate shall be 30%. However, the tax rate is coming as 10%. This is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
.........
Note Number
1990512
Topic
Car perk should not get prorated if employee joins in the middle of the month and loss of pay
Version 1
Validity 12.03.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal Changes
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 29.04.2014 13:44:32
Priority Correction with medium priority
When an employee joins the organization or any car scheme in the middle of the month or is on loss of pay for half of the month , then currently in the system, car perquisite amount is getting prorated . However as per the Government of India irrespective of the number of days worked in the month, perquisite amount should not be prorated .
For Example : An employee joins the car scheme on 15.4.2014 , perquisite amount for whole month is 900.Currently system calculates the perquisite amount for whole month as INR450 ( Prorated value ) where as employee monthly perquisite amount should be INR 900 as per the legal.
Courtesy SAP
...........
Note Number
2009141
Topic
Income Tax : Maximum upper limit has been changed to INR
9,99,99,99,999.00 from INR 9,99,99,999.00
Version 1
Validity 24.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Customizing
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 25.04.2014 06:56:28
Priority Correction with medium priority
In your organization you are executing the payroll for an employee whose annual salary is more than INR 9,99,99,999.00, in this case employee's income tax is incorrect
Courtesy SAP
...........
Note Number
2006270
Topic
Form 24Q : Error while validating the file for more
than one employee for fourth quarter by FVU
Version 3
Validity 23.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 24.04.2014 07:46:54
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing transaction PC00_M40_F24Q (Report HINCF24Q ) to download file for the fourth quarter in order to get it validated by FVU.
When the file is downloaded for more than one employee, error is occuring while validating the same file by FVU.
Courtesy SAP
........
Note Number
2003817
Topic
HINCF24Q: Inconsistent e-file for Q4
Version 2
Validity 14.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 15.04.2014 11:58:17
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing Form 24Q report HINCF24Q (Tcode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.
While executing the report for the quarter 4, e-file is generated inconsistenty and error occurs in the file validation utility.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number
1999115
Topic
Addition of Personnel Number parameter in BAdI HR_IN_ER_ADDRESS
Version 1
Validity 01.04.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 07.04.2014 15:54:13
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are using the BAdI HR_IN_ER_ADDRESS in order to determine the address of employer. If you want to determine the same for a specific employee, as of now it is not possible as there is no importing parameter for personnel number.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number
1997007
Topic
HINCF160: Short dump while executing Form 16 report
Version 1
Validity 26.03.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 26.03.2014 17:44:44
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing Form 16 report HINCF160 (TCode: PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.
A runtime error occurs while executing the report.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number
1945995
Topic HINCF160: Form 16 PAN Download and Email scenarios
Version 2
Validity 21.03.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Advance development
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 21.03.2014 19:20:34
Priority Correction with medium priority
This note includes changes for Form 16 download by PAN number and Email scenarios.
Courtesy SAP
........
Note Number
1989210
Topic Length of Name & Address Of Employer on Form 12BA
Version 2
Validity 19.03.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 21.03.2014 17:28:48
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are generating Form 16 (Tcode: PC00_M40_F16) for employees at your organization. The 'Name and Address of Organization' appears on Form 12BA of Form 16. The name and address of your organization is larger than the length which has been provided on standard Form 16. Due to this, the details which appear on Form 16 are not complete.
Courtesy SAP
.......
Note Number 1970656
Topic
Exemption Under Sec 80 D : Error while
updating Actual and proposed contribution
filed under payment for medical insurance
premiunm
Version 4
Validity 10.03.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program Error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 10.03.2014 17:03:06
Priority Correction with medium priority
As per the changes mentioned in the Note 1936835, an individual can declare INVESTMENT
1. Either towards "Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee" or towards "Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee".
2. Either towards " Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents non-senior Citizen)" or towards "Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents senior Ctz)".
But in case employee enters amount under proposed contribution of "Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee" and Actual contribution of "Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee", system throws an error. which is incorrect.
Validation on proposed contribution field should be seperate from the validation on actual contribution field in infotype 0585.
Courtesy SAP
...........
Note Number 1983332
Topic
ESS IT Declaration : Backend actual
amount not reflecting on ESS for"
Income from Other Sources'
Version 3
Validity 10.03.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program Error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 10.03.2014 16:22:57
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based IT Declaration application for employees in your organization. The 'Actual amount' column is enabled and employee record already exists in the backend for the FINANCIAL year
for "Income from Other Sources". In such a case whenever a new record is created the already available actual amount is not reflecting in ESS screen. Also the new record overwrites the actual amount of previous data.
Courtesy SAP
.......
Note Number 1983034
Topic
PPF: Investment limit changes
Version 1
Validity 24.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 24.02.2014 19:18:41
Priority Correction with medium priority
The Public Provident Fund limit for INVESTMENT fund in the system is up to 70,000. Henceforth, the PPF limit for investment fund will be up to 99,99,999. The overall limit for PPF will fall in the basket of limit under Section 80C which is 1 Lakh.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number
1980461
Topic
Inclusion of PAN of Landlord in IT0581
Version 1
Validity 18.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Legal change
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 24.02.2014 11:30:12
Priority Correction with medium priority
As per the Circular No. 8/2013, [F.No.275/192/2013-IT(B)], DATED 10-10-2013
"If annual rent paid by the employee exceeds Rs 1,00,000 per annum, it is mandatory for the employee to report PAN of the landlord to the employer. In case the landlord does not have a PAN, a declaration to this effect from the landlord along with the name and address of the landlord should be filed by the employee."
Till now in SAP system, there is no provision to capture the PAN of Landlord along with check if a declaration has been submitted.
Courtesy SAP
.........
Note Number 1974369
Topic
INTAX: Change in rounding of Cess
Version 3
Validity 20.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 20.02.2014 16:15:15
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC), for employees in your oranization. Once the taxable income is arrived, the income tax payable is determined. In the process, tax payable is determined and then education cess and higher & sec education cess are derived from it. As per standard computation, education cess and higher & sec education cess are rounded invidually and then added to tax payable to arrive at Net Tax payable.
However, education cess and higher & sec education cess shall not be rounded individually. It shall be added to arrive at Net Tax payable and then the Net Tax payable shall be rounded.
Courtesy SAP
.........
Note Number 1976599
Topic
HINCESI0: Employee not eligible for ESI Contribution should not apear in the ESI Report Output
Version 1
Validity 10.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 18.02.2014 16:48:13
Priority Correction with medium priority
In an Organization if you are executing the ESI Report via Transaction "PC00_M40_ESIF(report "HINCESI0" )", in that case all the employee, who are not eligible, are also appearing in the ALV List. This behavior is incorrect.
Courtesy SAP
..........
Note Number 1963582
Topic
40AY switch changes the T54C0 table values, irrespective of Business Function not active
Version 4
Validity 11.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 11.02.2014 17:03:55
Priority Correction with low priority
You are executing the transaction Pc00_m40_swch to activate the AFY solution for employees in your organization. You have activated the 40AY switch and saved it and the corresponding table T54C0 is updated with parameter 03 for India. This should not happen if the Business Function is not activated in your system, irrespective of changing the switch status in Pc00_m40_swch.The system behaves inconsistently.
Courtesy SAP
........
Note Number 1968184
Topic
HINCALC0: Warning Message in Payroll Log for NPS Contribution
Version 2
Validity 11.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 11.02.2014 15:50:47
Priority Correction with high priority
You are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization.
Provident FUND Contribution infotype (IT0587) has been maintained without checking NPS eligibility.
Warning messages in payroll log appears for NPS contribution even though the eligibility for NPS is not maintained.
Courtesy SAP
.........
Note Number 1964182
Topic
Marginal Tax Rate Not Returned When No Results Available For Current FY
Version 2
Validity 05.02.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 05.02.2014 12:19:46
Priority Correction with medium priority
You are trying to determine tax rate and tax payable on bonus payments given to an employee. In case, there are no payroll results available for the employee in current FINANCIAL Year, tax payable is determined using previous year results. In such cases, the tax payable is determined, however, the tax rate is not provided by the payroll function. This leads to inconsistency.
For reference:
Employee 'X' receives joining bonus amount of INR 5,00,000 in the month of April 2013. Employee has joined the organization in April 2013 as well. Now, when you want to determine tax payable on this bonus amount, bonus amount is determined but the marginal tax rate is not provided. This creates inconsistency for other calculations.
Courtesy SAP
...........
Note Number 1963592
Topic
ECR: EPS Wages Not Displayed for Period in Which Employee Turns 58 Years
Version 2
Validity 17.01.2014
Reason and Prerequisites Program error
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 29.01.2014 07:29:27
Priority Correction with medium priority
While generating ECR (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF) of an employee, for a period in which employee turns 58 years of age, employer pension wages are not displayed on the output. It appears Blank.
For Reference:
Employee 'X' turns 58 years of age on 2nd January 2014. Payroll for employee has been executed and employer pension wagetypes have been generated as well since there are two days till employee reaches 58 years of age. When ECR is generated for January period i.e. 10/2013, employer pension wages do not appear in the output. This is inconsistent. Since, cluster results contain values, corresponding values shall appear on ECR as well
Regards
A K Meher |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
