We have added search box. Key in SAP issue keyword to search
TopBottom

Announcement: wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.

RE:[sap-hr] Not Retaining the 7th Day Counter When Running Time Evaluation As Background Job

Posted by Admin at
Share this post:
Ma.gnolia DiggIt! Del.icio.us Yahoo Furl Technorati Reddit

Reply from JG-SAPHR on Mar 6 at 5:51 PM
If the PCRs are using PWS/DWS data only for determining the attendance count, then, you need to check from your business clients/SMEs which attendance or paid absence types need to be considered for counting the 7days. Then update your business req doc and design doc.
PCRs, time types need to be added/changed to add the hours from the attendance/absence types, then check if the total eligible hrs are at least 8, then add 1 to the days count.
This would be able to handle retros as well.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Duong
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 5:31 PM
Subject: Not Retaining the 7th Day Counter When Running Time Evaluation As Background Job

Hello all,

This is my very first post on this forum, so thank you in advance for reading and/or replying to this post.

The situation I have is I wrote a PCR where I would accumulate the 7th day counter via Operation ADDMB to time type 9922, which I can see in the SALDO table. I am using this Operation because the value needs to carry over into the next payroll week and payroll period. We are a bi-weekly payroll company, and the 7th day premium can occur at any day of the week for one of the unions. I have successfully implemented TM for a total of 6 unions in total the past 9 months and I am stuck on this one for the last two pay periods, and still unable find a solution to it.

In any case, it's not working (getting wrong value on TT 9922)for some employees when the Time Evaluation job processed in background (nightly except for payroll Mondays), however, it would worked 100% of the time when a Force Calculation date is entered.

Does anyone know why this would happen? Is it has to do with Cluster B2 table via tcode PT66?

I have also configured TT 9922 with '1' for both options in the Transfer period balance section.

Thanks,
Duong
Eastman Chemical

 
Reply to this email to post your response.
 
__.____._
Manage Settings | Unsubscribe | Create FAQ | Send Feedback
  
Copyright © 2014 Ziff Davis, Inc. and message author.
Ziff Davis, Inc. 28 E 28th Street New York, NY 10016
JG-SAPHR  

achievements
 
Mark as helpful
View this online
Ask a new question
 
In the Spotlight
Have a technical question? Need to find IT solutions? Ask your peers in the Toolbox for IT community.

_.____.__

0 comments:

Post a Comment

T r a n s l a t e to your language