Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Reply from VidhyaDhar on Mar 27 at 12:16 AM Hi, As rightly pointed out by Rocco, it would be better to create a set of users instead of individually entering user names in the pre-requisite. Maintaining a set and updating it as required makes it easier in the long run to include / exclude employees affected by this validation as and when changes do happen in the course of your business process. Regards, VidhyaDhar
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: emailtoilavarasan Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:10 AM Subject: Validation for Future Date Postings With Limited Users Hi, I created this kind of coding, it's working also now. Is it correct for long run? ((NOT(User = 'PRINCE'))-->(Posting Date > Current Date )) Prince | | Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |