Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Hi Donna, That is strange. Do the time records appear in IT 2001/2002? Maybe someone put the time in for those 2 days some time past, so they're already there. It could also happen if there is a data entry profile that allows auto-posting to HR, bypassing the CAT6 step. My previous employer didn't have such a profile, but it is possible to set one up like that. From an IT perspective, I check the CATSDB table to see the posting history of those days, to get an idea on what's going on. Sometimes just to be sure I end up forcing the transfer again in CAT6 for just those two days for just that person. IMHO, that is. :-)
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: donnamot Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:54 PM Subject: CATS6 Transfer Issue- Record from with subtype already posted to HR Gurus- I have an issue where when trying to transfer HR time I get the message that the time already exists in HR. I've check in PA61 for the entries but they are not there. I checked PT40 for errors and what I find are errors saying that the employee was not at work for those days. I've also checked time events and the employee does clock in/clock out. However, not for those two days. He traveled for those two days so he didn't clock in but does need to post time. do the errors for these two days just need to be corrected by manually posting the time entries in PA61? How do I get rid of the errors? Thanks in advance, Donna | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Most Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |