Re: [sap-log-pp] Keeps backflushing
Posted by
Admin at
|
Share this post:
|
0 Comments
| | Posted by KAmlesh_BArot (Core Team Member - PP Module) on Feb 2 at 3:48 PM | |
Hi:
One place at there back flush may be set that is component allocation in
routing. So check some set by mistake.
KAmlesh
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, NJensen via sap-log-pp <
sap-log-pp@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
> Posted by NJensen
> on Feb 2 at 8:19 AM
> We have some components in SAP which keeps showing up in our COGI report
> because it says that the components are set to backflush. I have checked MM
> and all the routes, and they are not set to backflush. Could there be other
> reasons that the components keeps being set at backflush acoording to our
> COGI report?Thanks for your support
__.____._ One place at there back flush may be set that is component allocation in
routing. So check some set by mistake.
KAmlesh
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, NJensen via sap-log-pp <
sap-log-pp@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
> Posted by NJensen
> on Feb 2 at 8:19 AM
> We have some components in SAP which keeps showing up in our COGI report
> because it says that the components are set to backflush. I have checked MM
> and all the routes, and they are not set to backflush. Could there be other
> reasons that the components keeps being set at backflush acoording to our
> COGI report?Thanks for your support
Copyright © 2010 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
SAP Logistics Production Planning Top Contributor
Contributed the most posts in a group for a month to earn a Silver Achievement
Related Content
In the Spotlight
White Papers
In the Spotlight
Share Knowledge About SAP Scripting. Join the New Discussion Group
View this thread online
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion
Manage group e-mails
Create an FAQ on this topic
Tell us what you think
Unsubscribe from discussion