SAP Library - Find your answers

Hi,
MRP on 2 different warehouse is not possible. You can do this.
Initially run the MRP & create production order & purchase order for 01
warehouse with the required qty. Then again run MRP & create production
order & purchase order for another WH & remaining qty. Please let me know if
you any other alternate.
Regards,
Maheswaran.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:07 AM, NVSKAMESH via sap-business-one <
sap-business-one@groups.ittoolbox.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Experts,
> My client has 2 production facilities, which also act as supplying
> warehouses in sales order.
> Eg:
> My BOM
> Main Item = FG01, Qty =1, Default Warehouse = 01
> Line Item = RM01, Qty =1, Issue Warehouse = 01
> The item FG01 is an MRP make item, produced in both the warehouse and stock
> maintained in both the warehouses.
> The Line Item RM01 is an MRP BUY item, purchased in both the warehouses and
> stock maintained in both the warehouses.
> I have a sales order for FG01 for a qty of 10 to be supplied from Warehouse
> 01 and qty 15 from warehouse 02. So, i have a total requirement of 25 units
> for FG01, combining warehouses 01 and 02.
> When i run MRP wizard, following is the current result:
> FG01 - Production Order for Qty25 units from warehouse 01
> RM01 - Purchase Order for Qty 25 units from warehouse 01.
> The expected result (order recommendation report) is,
> FG01 - Production Order for Qty 10 on Warehouse 01
> RM01 - Purchase Order for Qty 10 on warehouse 01
> FG01 - Production Order for Qty 15 on warehouse 02
> RM01 - Purchase Order Qty 15 on warehouse 02.
> Duplicate item code for different warehouses to enable different BOMs is
> not an option as there are around 4000 items and it would lead to confusion
> in item codes for warehouses for the sales order processing team.
> Can anyone suggest how to work around this limitation of SAP B1? Might be
> some stored procedure or configuration that needs to be done? Which stored
> procedure does MRP Wizard use, if any?
> This is the spine of our project implementation. Without this the project
> would be hollow. This is mission critical.
> Please reply.
> Thanks,
> Kamesh __.____._