Announcement:
wanna exchange links? contact me at sapchatroom@gmail.com.
Posted by
Admin at
Hi Please can you let me know how the evaluation path US_ACTGR should be amended to include the A 210 relationship. Should it be inserted after a particular seq. number? This is the first time I'm attempting this. Please advise.
Thanks
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Juliet Henry
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 4:37 PM
Subject: Substitution Relation A-210 not working
Hi,
I assume that "the roleman program" you are refer to is the PFUD transaction? If so, unless you have adjusted the evaluation path US-ACTGR to take the A210 relationship into consideration, you will not see the roles of the position assigned to the user who is performing the substitution.
However, the UWL (universal worklist), does take the A210 relationship into account and the user can see additional personnel for which administration is required. As I understand it, this occurs without having to update the roles assigned to the user.
Regards,
Juliet |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight   _.____.__ |
